How I brought direction to a fast-moving AI product

An experimental AI-driven site builder at GoDaddy was hallucinating and sending users into chat loops five weeks before launch and investor demo. I shifted the team’s focus from building more editing features to fixing the critical issues eroding trust in the product, and we shipped a demo we could stand behind.

What we shipped: an AI that builds a WordPress site from a conversation.

Team

Lead Product Designer (me)
Associate Designer
7 Engineers
2 Product Managers
2 Engineering Managers

Skills

Journey mapping
Heuristic review
Service design
Analytics review
Workshop facilitation
Interaction design

Timeline

Oct 2024–Mar 2025

Impact

The product becomes part of GoDaddy's branded AI offering, successful investor demo, accelerated and improved internal workflow.

Problem

Tunnel vision led to gaps in the journey

When I joined I found a team focused on creating editing tools without a map of how everything worked together, developing at the same time as designing.

The gaps showed up when you tried to get through the experience. A user could fall into a continuous chat loop with no clear path except to publish their site. The patterns used for editing allowed too many changes at once, which made the hallucinations worse. Key steps in the onboarding, like choosing a data center, had gone missing.

Before
Before: the earlier flow published the site after the first chat response, then buried edits in dropdowns.
  • Generating the site after the first response taxed the AI’s memory with each chat that followed, setting up a system where hallucinations were very likely.
  • Editing tools were nested in dropdowns, making complicated interactions tricky. The bulk save contributed to hallucinations.
  • Making publish the only path forward puts pressure to complete the site, and adds extra steps like setting up the domain name during onboarding.

Solutions

Trading more features for a better overall experience

Calling out experience gaps from a user’s perspective made it easier for the whole team prioritize problems and propose solutions together. I led the conversation to pause on releasing editing tools until after the demo and focus instead on improving the hallucinations and chat loops that hindered the user getting through onboarding. We also added exit surveys to prioritize user feedback in these early stages.

After
After: onboarding gathers a brief up front so the AI has context before building the first version.
  • We set up the flow into two steps, gathering info then editing. By gathering information up front the AI had more context to build a more accurate site on first try.
  • The progress forward buttons are direct and not misleading to a published state.
  • If the user closes out or leaves the experience, we use it as an opportunity to get feedback.

Focused UI patterns for editing your site

We fast followed after the demo with a stronger set of editing tools. I worked at a higher elevation workshopping what needed to be in the editing tools and high level patterns that wouldn't affect hallucinations. Rafael took point on crafting the UI patterns and all of the interactions that need to happen in between.

After: editing moved into structured controls next to a live preview.
After: editing moved into a structured layout that allowed more granular controls and focused on one tool at a time.

Delivering defined solutions instead of feature to feature

Instead of building everything at once, I drove a system to design and ship in milestones. We defined buckets of work and let real user feedback inform what came next. Shifting from a feature-by-feature push to milestone-based, user-first work allowed us to learn easier with each new push.

Feedback sorted into themes to inform the next milestone.
Design specs handed off to engineering for a scoped milestone.
After: I took point on running workshops and organizing future work, while my design partner Rafael focused on UI and specs.

Impact

Why it mattered

Product outcome

Cohesive demo

The AI Web Designer was folded into GoDaddy’s official branded AI suite after the demo.

Team delivery

Workflow clarity

A milestone-based ship model gave design and engineering clarity on what each release owned.

Feedback loop

User-driven decisions

Exit surveys at drop-off points put customer feedback, not a feature list, in front of the team each release.

“Thank you, Kelsey, for joining in on the AI Web Designer project and making huge contributions in a short amount of time, to help us deliver the best possible experience by our December timeline. It has been fantastic to watch your partnership with Rafael & the whole prod/eng team.”
— Design Director

Reflection

Design as a driver for clarity

On reflection: My most impactful work came from holding context for the whole experience while the team was focused on the individual parts. Suggesting we pause on shipping editing tools created tension. That part is hard for me, because I’m relationship-oriented and I care about my partnerships. What I took away is how to advocate for what I see while still partnering closely with the team. My favorite piece of feedback on this project came from one of the AI engineers: “Fighting for customer experience and asking difficult questions is what makes this company better. Thank you so much for all your hard work in achieving great customer outcomes.”

Next case study

How providing value upfront increased new client dashboards by 134%

Read next